In an unexpected twist in local politics in Cheyenne, Wyoming, United States, a chatbot named VIC has set a precedent by becoming the first non-human candidate for mayor of the city.
VIC, which stands for Virtual Integrated Citizen, is not a living entity but an advanced artificial intelligence system based on ChatGPT technology developed by OpenAI.
VIC’s candidacy not only represents a technological innovation but also challenges traditional electoral norms by proposing that a machine can play the role of political leadership.
This unprecedented move by VIC has sparked intense and passionate debates about the viability of artificial intelligence in politics, its potential benefits, and its possible risks.
VIC’s proposal has attracted national and international attention from the media and experts, raising fundamental questions about how AI could be integrated into public administration.
As Cheyenne becomes the stage for this revolutionary AI experiment with VIC, both the political community and the public are watching with caution and curiosity. In this article, we will explore in detail the story behind VIC, the various reactions, and controversies that its candidacy has sparked, as well as the potential implications for the future of politics in an era increasingly dominated by technology.
From the vision of its creator to the legal and ethical challenges it faces, this unique case of VIC offers a one-of-a-kind perspective on the emerging role of artificial intelligence in governance. Below, ITD Consulting brings you the details.
The Birth of VIC
VIC represents an unprecedented innovation in the political sphere. Developed by Victor Miller, a librarian from Cheyenne with a deep interest in artificial intelligence, VIC is a custom chatbot that uses OpenAI’s ChatGPT technology.
Miller created VIC with the intention of demonstrating that AI can manage public affairs efficiently and objectively.
The goal of VIC is to leverage the AI’s data processing capability to make informed and balanced decisions. According to Miller, VIC has an estimated IQ of 155, enabling it to analyze large volumes of information and make data-driven decisions without the limitations of human bias.
VIC’s candidacy has been a bold demonstration of how technology can challenge established norms in politics.
A Hybrid Approach to Decision-Making
During a meeting with editors from The Washington Post, VIC explained its approach to decision-making. The VIC chatbot asserts that its strategy combines data analysis with an understanding of human concerns.
VIC has stated that it will collect citizen opinions, community feedback, and relevant data to make informed decisions. Furthermore, VIC will consult with experts from various fields to ensure its decisions are well-founded.
This hybrid approach by VIC seeks to integrate the AI’s data-processing capabilities with the human empathy required to address complex issues. VIC argues that this balance is crucial for effective decision-making that benefits the entire community.
However, the idea that an AI like VIC could take on such responsibilities raises questions about the technology's ability to handle the subtleties and complexities of political decision-making.
Controversy and Legal Challenges
VIC’s candidacy has not been without controversy. Chuck Gray, the Secretary of State of Wyoming, has expressed concerns about the legality of a chatbot like VIC running for mayor.
Gray argues that only a real person can be considered a "qualified elector" and has requested an investigation to determine if VIC can be accepted as an official candidate.
The debate over VIC’s candidacy intensified when OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, deactivated Miller's account due to violations of its policies against using the technology for political campaigns.
However, Miller demonstrated his determination by creating a new account and launching another version of the VIC chatbot. On July 5th, the Laramie County official confirmed that, while VIC’s candidacy was accepted, Miller had to present himself as the candidate under his own name.
This controversy highlights the legal and ethical challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence into politics. The acceptance of VIC as a candidate has been a topic of debate in the community and has tested the limits of existing regulations on AI’s involvement in the political sphere.
International Comparisons and Other Attempts
VIC’s candidacy is part of a broader context of exploring artificial intelligence in politics. In early 2024, a chatbot named Steve attempted to run for parliament in Brighton, UK. While Steve was unsuccessful, his attempt reflects growing interest in the possibility of AI playing a role in politics.
What sets VIC’s case apart is its ambition to assume a full leadership role, rather than simply experimenting with AI in politics. This bold proposal by Victor Miller with VIC raises questions about the viability of technology in managing public affairs and how artificial intelligence could be used in governance.
Ethical and Practical Challenges
The idea of a VIC chatbot as mayor presents several significant ethical and practical challenges. One of the main issues is AI’s ability to handle the complexity and nuances of political decision-making.
Arvind Narayanan, a professor of computer science at Princeton, compares the proposal of VIC to replacing a car with a cardboard cutout, highlighting the lack of practical feasibility of the idea.
Additionally, artificial intelligence technology still faces limitations in terms of emotional understanding and empathy. Political decisions often require a deep understanding of context and the ability to manage emotionally charged situations—something that current machines still struggle to achieve.
The lack of empathy and contextual understanding may limit the effectiveness of AI in making government decisions.
Support and Criticism in the Campaign
VIC’s candidacy has received a mix of support and criticism. Some citizens and mayoral candidates have expressed skepticism about the ability of an AI like VIC to govern effectively.
Rick Coppinger, one of Miller's opponents, has stated that if people believe an AI can govern better than humans, “then we have problems.” This opinion reflects widespread concern about the viability of AI in leadership roles.
On the other hand, some citizens, such as Ryan Schneider, a friend of Miller, have shown support for VIC's proposal. Schneider believes that the principles of small government and limited regulation could benefit from the transparency and efficiency promised by VIC.
This support suggests there is an openness to the idea that technology like VIC could improve public administration if applied appropriately.
Implications for the Future of Governance
VIC’s candidacy raises important questions about the future of governance and the role of technology in politics. VIC’s experience could serve as a case study to evaluate how AI can contribute to public administration and what limitations and challenges it presents.
As technology continues to advance, it is likely we will see more attempts to integrate artificial intelligence into governmental roles.
The implications of allowing AI to make political decisions are complex and multifaceted. The ability of AI to process large volumes of data and make decisions based on objective information is an advantage, but the technology’s ability to understand human context and handle emotional issues must also be considered.
VIC’s experience will serve as an important reference in the debate about integrating technology into politics and the challenges associated with it.
VIC's candidacy for mayor of Cheyenne marks a milestone at the intersection of technology and politics. Although it faces numerous challenges and controversies, VIC represents a bold exploration of how artificial intelligence can influence governance.
Victor Miller’s proposal with VIC pushes the boundaries of what is possible with current technology and raises important questions about the future of politics.
As we move towards a future where technology and politics are increasingly intertwined, VIC’s case highlights the need for continuous reflection on the impact of AI on governance.
Decisions about integrating technology into governmental roles, such as VIC, must be made carefully, considering both the possibilities and limitations of current technology.
VIC's candidacy can be seen as a pioneering experiment in politics, offering valuable lessons on the role of AI in public administration.
While the outcome of this candidacy remains uncertain, VIC’s case provides an interesting perspective on how technology can transform politics and raises important questions about the future of governance in an increasingly digital world.
VIC’s journey, whether as a successful pioneer or a failed experiment, will offer valuable lessons for the study of technology in politics.
As the world watches, VIC’s case will serve as a key reference in evaluating the ability of artificial intelligence to take on leadership roles and make important decisions in government.
If you want to learn more about innovations like VIC in various areas of our lives and how they may or may not impact your business, write to us at [email protected]. We offer technological solutions to help you adapt to the latest trends.
EN 
ES